by ParaTweeT » Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:20 am
Now after talking with Shane a bit and doing some testing I would look at your "custom O-Ring Nub". If you all are using that it could be causing too much resistance and thus your significant loss in FPS. I lost almost 24 FPS by using an O-Ring Nub in one test. Different size O-Rings and different hop-up chambers are all going to give different results. From a field tech perspective a new hop-up bucking that comes with the nub (check the package to be sure) is a good start.
As for the comment on P90 inner barrel being short. Well that might be the case if it was not an extended inner barrel. Also your inner barrel length has more to do with Accuracy than FPS. The only counter to this would be if you do not have enough volume in your Cylinder to fill that barrel you would end up with barrel suck and loose huge amounts of FPS.
For the 25% loss that is waaaayy to much of a loss for a .05g change. With that theory you would get far less fps than anyone does. General rule of thumb (without the long formulation) is 50fps loss per .05g increase. With 25% loss that means one of my M4's shooting 400 FPS would be shooting 300 FPS with .25's. Increase the spring and your increase in loss would occur. This just is not the case as anyone who has more than a few guns would attest to. I personally have 4 M4's, 1 P90, 13 AK 47's, 2 MP5's and a few others. With nearly all of these guns I have chron'd both .20's and .25's and the base of 50fps loss with the .05g increase is pretty close (often its less than 50fps loss).
The Army is a funnel. You pour in training, doctrine, equipment and technology, and out of the bottom comes one lone soldier walking point.